Web22 nov. 2024 · Involuntary rehab commitment, often known as Section 33, is a South African statute that allows a qualified person to seek a court order compelling someone to be committed and treated involuntarily for an alcohol or substance use disorder. According to estimates, at least 30% of the population of South Africa is addicted to something. Web22 sep. 2014 · section 35.30; or (b) He or she reasonably believes that such other person is committing or attempting to commit a kidnapping, forcible rape, forcible criminal sexual act or robbery; or (c) He or she reasonably believes that such other person is committing or attempting to commit a burglary, and the circumstances are such that
Section 35 Mass.gov
WebSection 35 applies if you are a person accused of a crime in criminal proceedings. The Crown Court or Magistrates' Court can remand you to hospital if one doctor has evidence … Web1 nov. 2016 · As a detective with the Lowell Police Department, Sheryl Mercier can request a court order that forces anyone abusing drugs or alcohol to be committed to a rehabilitation facility. Also known as... photo shop in appleton wi
INAN - Section 35 of the Constitution Act 1982 - Canada.ca
WebSummary of the detaining sections The most common sections which you will come across in practice are sections 2, 3, 37, 37/41, and 47/49. These, together with other detaining sections, are summarised briefly below. Contents 1 Section 2: admission for assessment 2 Section 3: admission for treatment 3 Section 4: emergency admission for … WebYou have the right to refuse treatment for your mental health problem if you are sectioned under sections 4, 5, 35, 135 and 136, or if you are under a Mental Health Act guardian. The information on consent to treatment can be found here. Can I get my friend sectioned? A person can only be sectioned if they meet certain criteria. Web13 jun. 2002 · But those interests are not implicated when a defendant raises a section 35.15 defense which is available even when the person subjected to force was lawfully present on the property. The significance of this distinction is evident in this case: defendant could not rely on section 35.20 because Carter was a guest of a tenant but he was … photo shop horsforth town street