R bernard v enfield council 2002
WebMar 21, 2024 · Bernard & another v Enfield London Borough Council (25 October 2002) (Unreported) (Admin Court) S21 National Assistance Act 1948 – suitable accommodation … WebMay 22, 2014 · It was only at a hearing on March 21, 2002 that the defendant first conceded that it did owe a duty to the claimants under s.21 . Eventually, the claimants were offered …
R bernard v enfield council 2002
Did you know?
WebMR R CLAYTON QC AND MISS J RICHARDS (instructed by Tyrer Roxburgh) appeared on behalf of the CLAIMANT MR H HARROP-GRIFFITHS (instructed by London Borough of … WebIn R (on the application of Bernard) v Enfield London Borough Council (2002), the failure by the council to provide suitably adapted accommodation for the applicant and her family …
WebMar 11, 2024 · Counsel also relied on the decisions of Sullivan J in R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC [2002] EWHC 2282 (Admin), [2003] HRLR 111, para 45, Stanley Burnton J in R (KB) v South London and South and West Region Mental Health Review Tribunal [2003] EWHC 193 (Admin), [2004] QB 936, paras 47 and 53 and the Court of Appeal in Anufrijeva v … WebKey point. This case first in a trilogy of decisions pre-Human Rights Act including W v Essex CC and Phelps v Hillingdon LBC where the Lords showed a sceptical attitude towards …
WebThe 2002 Enfield Borough Council election took place on 2 May 2002 to elect members of Enfield London Borough Council in London, England. The whole council was up for … WebMay 7, 2024 · The case of of R(Idolo) v London Borough of Bromley [2024] EWHC 860 (Admin) also provides a notable counterpoint to R(CP) v North East Lincolnshire Council …
WebIt would open the question of the defence of drunkenness, one which has always been related to the capacity to form a specific intent and which has generally been excluded by …
WebMay 17, 2024 · Cited by: Cited – Calgin, Regina (on the Application of) v London Borough of Enfield Admn 29-Jul-2005. The claimant complained that having applied for housing in the borough they had in fact housed him outside the borough. Held: The authority had a duty to house the applicant so far it was reasonably practicable within its borders. dick memorial benevolent societyWebMar 4, 2002 · Mr. Bryan McGuire (instructed by London Borough of Enfield) for the Defendant. This application for judicial review is concerned with two decisions of the … citroen berlingo road tax costWebPrivy Council: St Helena Supreme Court: United Arab Emirates: Courts: Abu Dhabi Global Market judgments (Court of Appeal) Abu Dhabi Global Market judgments (Court of First Instance) Qatar: Courts: Qatar International Court: Cayman Islands: Courts: Grand Court of the Cayman Islands Financial Services Division: citroen berlingo risk of filter cloggingWebThe aims of this thesis are to determine to what extent the Crown remains important as a source of legitimacy for the constitutional order and as a focus of sovereignty; how the … dick medical supply 30079bkWebSee the report of the decision of Jacobs J in the equitable jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of New South Wales: Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council v Cooney (1962) 8 LGRA 8 at 13-14. … dick measuring toolWebJul 11, 2024 · Bernard, Regina (on the Application of) v London Borough of Enfield: Admn 25 Oct 2002. The claimants were husband and wife. They had six children. The wife was … dick mens winter coatsWebIt had not recognised that it should treat the case as a Part VII homeless case. There had been precedent, in which it was found that failure to fulfil homelessness duties … dick me down in dallas